Good article Lee as it sparked some interesting debate. When it comes to OpenStack vs VMware, a lot of misinformation is floating around the web. “Opinionated” storage solution through integration with vSphere via Project Pacific; Self-Service Provisioning. Cookie Preferences I’d like to wait for the dust to settle before tackling this one. The contenders will be judged in the following categories: design, features, use cases, and value. The only mention of vCloud is in the first paragraph. OpenStack is used as a single point cloud-based platform. Dynamic data can be supported by an external monitoring solution such as Nagios working with the scheduler; however, the scheduler will still only affect the initial placement of VMs. It should not be confused with fault tolerance (FT), as HA is not fault tolerant. I’ve given a couple of presentations to the SF Bay OpenStack Meetup on this topic and many peers have asked me to write about it. OpenStack is open source and no single company controls its destiny. A user doesn’t have a distributed filesystem, and doesn’t want one for understandable reasons—perhaps the costs of enterprise storage and network latency—but wants to be able to perform maintenance operations on hypervisors without interrupting VMs. I wish I could have covered all VMware features in this post, but this post is not only about feature comparison and the feature section is already quite long. As per the recent OpenStack user survey, KVM is the most widely adopted hypervisor in the OpenStack community. VMware vSphere and open source project OpenStack present two different ways of structuring an infrastructure. vROPs) …. I chose vmotion (block and live), DRS, DPM, VM level HA, and FT as these were the most popular among clients when weighing OpenStack and VMware. Suresh’s comment is very accurate, and given the lack of documentation and “OpenStack” engineers TODAY, the costs are not accurately accounted for in the article. I’d argue with a few tweaks, OpenStack could be better at handling the Pets paradigm as well. But instead, have a global layer based on OpenStack… but is still capable to manage and provision to underlying resources which uses one or more hypervisor technologies (Hyper-V, KVM, VWWare, Public Cloud, etc). OpenStack vs VMware: Conclusions Due to the open-source nature of the OpenStack, the costs associated with its initial roll-out and ongoing operations are usually lower compared to VMware. Good article. The VMware driver supports vCenter version 5.5.0 and later. VMware Bests Red Hat In OpenStack Performance, Cost Study While the operating assumption is that the OpenStack framework works best on open source components such as KVM, a just completed study by Principled Technologies and commissioned by VMware showed otherwise. This is why analysts frequently miss the mark and technologists who can’t see past technology often end up frustrated. Discover the benefits and drawbacks that come with allowing a ... Finding the right server operating temperature can be tricky. Or you can verify their general user satisfaction rating, 100% for Apache CloudStack vs. 99% for OpenStack. OpenStack has been catching up in features that they deem useful for cloud-aware tenants but have also dropped features deemed lower priority in order to focus on supporting more hardware solutions. In one of our environments, we ended up turning off DRS because of it’s weaknesses this way.. And wrote our own scheduling algorithm to increase utilization further… unfortunately, because vmware changed things, in a closed way, across versions it was hard to maintain this customization. Compares VMware’s proprietary virtualisation offerings with an open-source approach, Canonical’s Charmed OpenStack. Certain releases of the platform, such as 2017's Ocata release, include container management services that enable you to run container orchestrators such as Apache Mesos, Docker and Kubernetes. How does VMware VIO add cloud functionality to ... VMware Integrated OpenStack features, cost, benefits ... VMware Integrated OpenStack 2.0 turns up the heat, VMware NSX vs. Microsoft Hyper-V network virtualization, Use virtual clusters to avoid container sprawl, Software-defined power offers benefits, but lacks popular interest, How to troubleshoot a VMware Horizon black screen, Running GPU passthrough for a virtual desktop with Hyper-V, 7 benefits of colocation for your business and 4 challenges, Avoid server overheating with ASHRAE data center guidelines, Hidden colocation cost drivers to look out for in 2021, AWS re:Invent 2020 underscores push toward cloud in pandemic, Multi-cloud networking -- how to choose the right path. DRS continuously monitors the active workload and the available resources and performs VM migrations to maximize workload performance. Since they belong to two different generations of architecture, a direct comparison of OpenStack and VMware is difficult. This pile of legacy, and often cumbersome, process around delivery to ensure security and compliance is at the core of the business. This approach requires external storage that supports OpenStack's Cinder API. Completely unrelated to that point: I’d like to see you keep this going and talk about security in both environments.