You can record in 14 or 12-bit, with a selection of uncompressed, lossless compressed or compressed options. As for metering, the Z6 tends to overexpose a little bit more (between 1/3 and 2/3Ev) and this is especially true with the centre weight setting. Because of this, I dive into each lens to uncover the pros and cons in terms of quality, build, important features, etc. Nikon D850 vs Sony A7R III - Features. It’s not surprising to find a different mount on each camera since we’re talking … Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference. On the other hand, Nikon Z6 has some extra features which may become a game changer if you have some specific requirements. The A7 III is much cooler. Touch sensitivity is available on both cameras but the Nikon offers more possibilities. Below you can see the Z6 and A7 III sensor size comparison. The second advantage of XQD cards is that they’re supposed to be faster and you’ll notice this when transferring files to your computer with an XQD card reader. Since then, IBIS as been added to all the A7 products, as well as the A9 and the a6500. The MIRRORLESS WARS BEGIN! The post Sony a7III vs Nikon Z6II vs Panasonic S5 vs Canon R6 appeared first on Sony Addict. But it would be a mistake to underestimate the Nikon Z6 because it has much to offer. The Z6 has a maximum burst speed of 12fps, which is a bit faster than the 10fps on the A7 III. We used the two cameras with a variety of lenses for this comparison. Note: the Z6 also supports CFexpress cards (type B) which has the same size as XQD. The grip is taller and more comfortable, and the controls are more intuitive. With the Straight-Out-Of-Camera JPGs, the Sony delivers crisper details without the need to increase sharpness too much. Both cameras have Full frame sensors but Nikon Z6 has a 25.0 MP and Sony A7 III has a 24.0 MP resolution. You can look at more images taken with the two cameras, and download straight out of camera JPGs and RAW files from the links below: If you’re interested in how the two cameras compare to other products, here is a list of additional comparisons we’ve written: Published July 12, 2019 By Mathieu Filed Under: Sony vs Nikon Tagged With: camera comparison, Nikon, Sony. The Z6 added the same function via firmware 3.0 but it only works for dogs and cats at the moment. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. In low light, they both perform well although the A7 III is generally more reactive. When we take a look at the color tones, I prefer the warmer tones on the Nikon opposed to the Sony, which has a cooler tone. The camera performs well with adapted lenses and the only thing I’ve noticed is that when the frame is completely out of focus and the camera needs to shorten the focus distance, it can be quite slow to react. The third example features skin tones. Sigma has released an E-mount version of most of its Art prime lenses, and is planning to announce the first lenses designed specifically for mirrorless. Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. It rarely fails and is a great tool for portraits. To test the stabilisation, I take about 10 pictures at different shutter speeds, not only to see how far I can go but also to see how consistent the performance is. The A7 III is the only one to have an exposure compensation dial however, and I like the position of the video recording button near the EVF. The A7 III doesn’t offer the option to prioritise the left or right eye, although this possibility exists on other models like the A6400 and A9. Sony raw files seem a bit sharper out of camera, but Nikon colors/metering are easier to work with especially in diverse lighting. The Nikon D3200 and the Sony Alpha A7 III are two digital cameras that were announced, respectively, in April 2012 and February 2018. Launching the original Nikon Z6 and Nikon Z7 back in 2018, these two cameras have become firm favorites amongst photographers thanks to a blend of refined handling, great image quality and excellent performance. Sony a7III vs. Canon EOS R vs. Nikon Z6 2020 Rematch! Remote control and image transfer are two of the main things you can do with this configuration. Finally the Z6 features an OLED panel on top that displays the settings used, the remaining battery life and other useful information. The FTZ adapter is often included with the camera. The A7 III can be found for around $2000, £1750 or €2000 body only. Both Z6 and A7 III have weather sealings in their body, making them resistant to water and dust. Conclusion15. - Duration: 14:53. Nikon files just need a bit more sharpening in post to match Sony files. I did boost the exposure on the Sony by 1 stop, so it’s a little bit darker. The Z6 is precise and reliable. Holding the card or pulling it out feels safer. In our second example, the Z6 shows more powerful reds with the default settings in Lightroom. The viewfinder and LCD screen have more resolution and therefore are much nicer to use. Due out in November and September for $1,995 and $3,399, respectively, these two cameras … Bluetooth is useful to acquire location information. The two cameras are closely matched and each can produce pro-quality stills and video content. With the Portrait profile, both cameras soften the contrast but once again the Z6 retains a bit more red. You may also be interested in these comparisons: Nikon Z6 Mark II vs Nikon Z6 Nikon Z6 Mark II vs Sony Alpha A7 III. I’ve been eager to publish this comparison for some time now, but the reason I decided not to rush my review is because I wanted to answer a specific question: is the Z6 a better choice than the A7 III? Nikon Z6 vs Sony A7 III — Video and Other Features Both cameras can shoot 4K video at up to 30fps. The Quick Sharp slider will adjust them automatically but the effect can be a bit too strong for my taste. The first thing we notice is that the Nikon image is brighter, has more contrast and more vibrant greens. Despite not being that much larger than the Sony, it just feels so much better in the hand. If you activate the Low-Light AF, the Z6 capabilities increase to -4Ev … In this review, we will be comparing A7 III and Z6, two Pro Mirrorless cameras from Sony and Nikon. With Extra Fine JPGs, it lasts at full speed for 17s. Both Nikon Z6 and Sony A7 III has Sensor based Image stabilization which means that all the lenses will be stabilized in these bodies. The day that Sony comes out with a better design will be the day that there won’t be much left to criticise about the A7 series at all. That being said, I’ve used SD cards for many years and I’ve never had serious problems with regards to the size or build quality, so it’s probably more psychological than anything else. I did compared images from both cameras using the same lens (Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art). Panasonic S5 vs Sony A7 III. As I’ve explained in other articles, it checks all the boxes and is competitively priced. Additionally, the A7 III can work via NFC with compatible devices. Related posts: Cameras Coming From Fujifilm, Sony, Canon, Nikon, Panasonic, Olympus, and Hasselblad in 2019 ; Size Comparison Canon EOS R vs Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony a7RIII vs Nikon Z7 ; Nikon Z6 vs Sony A7 III — Video and Other Features Both cameras can shoot 4K video at up to 30fps. On the A7 III it works with USB, and you can connect to a FTP server via Wifi. The minimum sensitivity is -3Ev on the Sony and -2Ev on the Nikon. Sony has been the established leader with a 5-year head start. The a7III is a very nice camera and very capable. The Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 and the Sony Alpha A7 III are two enthusiast cameras that were announced, respectively, in September 2020 and February 2018. The 16-minute video covers a fairly extensive list of the two cameras capabilities. The a7III is a very nice camera and very capable. The Nikon Z6 ($1,796.95) is their direct competitor to the Sony a7 III, while the Nikon Z7 ($2,596.95) on Amazon, is set to go head to head with the Sony a7R III camera.. Sony are known for their aggressive R&D approach which has worked out … Although they are different types of camera, the Nikon D850 and Sony A7R III produce similar results when they are put in practice. Believe me, I know how exciting, yet difficult it can be to find the perfect lens for your camera especially since it can be an investment. The Low and Normal values give similar results on both cameras and the Z6 has an extra High option. I really like the output I'm seeing from the Z6. You won’t find a built-in flash on either camera and no unit is provided in the box. Both models deliver outstanding image quality when it comes to dynamic range and high ISO performance, and the autofocus is much closer than you would think. Ethics statement: We bought the Z6 and the A7 III to produce our articles. There is only 6 months difference between Z6 and A7 III so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level. They may look identical, but our Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II head-to-head will help you pick which one of Nikon's latest full-frame mirrorless cameras is right for you. We are going to take a look at her face and skin tone. Main Specs3. The same comment applies to the Vivid profile. The Nikon has various level of compression for the RAW files. The A7 III is no different and once again, you can work with a larger number of points which is useful, especially with subjects that move fast and unpredictably. The Z6 on the other hand can easily start to focus on the left or on the right rather than staying at the centre. The RAW files, with the same settings and same colour profile applied, are warmer on the Nikon whereas the Sony has a more dominant green tint (again this can change depending on the software used). So how do they compare? The autofocus in low light is a bit faster, Eye AF is quicker at detecting the subject right away, the buffer capabilities are greater and the battery lasts for longer. Furthermore, I found the colours more natural on the Z6 screen. Although both the Nikon Z6 and Sony A7 III have a $2000 price tag, there are some important feature differences between them, too. Sony hasn’t improved the performance significantly since the A7 II, or at least I haven’t found this to be the case when reviewing the various cameras mentioned above, and that includes the A7 III as well. The minimum sensitivity is -3Ev on the Sony and -2Ev on the Nikon. Z6 users can rely on the extensive catalogue of Nikon F-mount lenses thanks to the FTZ adapter but so can Sony with its LA-EA3 adapter and third party manufactures such as Sigma and Metabones which open the door to Canon EF lenses. The A7 III offers 11 custom keys that include the control wheel on the rear. This brings me to this question: buy the latest and greatest (Z6ii) or older model (Z6) knowing I will probably keep the camera 5+ years. The official product is very good but expensive. When you buy into a camera system it isn’t just a matter of getting all your lenses and gear to be compatible. | Full frame (35.8 x 23.8 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor. Nikon also makes much greater use of the touch-control so that’s another win here for Nikon. Furthermore, the space between the grip and the lens barrel can be narrow with select Sony primes and zooms. The cameras share many specs and features, though there are a few important differences. I accidentally scratched the top part of my Z6 where the Nikon logo is. If you use a large and heavy lens, you’ll miss having some extra millimetres of space there as well. The two cameras have the same sensitivity range: it goes from 100 to 51200 ISO, with extended values down to ISO 50 and up to ISO 204800. The A7 III allows you to select a focus point and swipe though your images in playback mode but not much else. I see both A7iii & A7C as excellent cameras in their own right. For example I use the value corresponding to the fastest performance with birds in flight so that the AF is as reactive as possible (0 on the Nikon, 5 on the Sony), whereas for football I kept the A7 III to 3 (standard) and the Z6 at 2. Z6ii will probably continue getting firmware updates. In continuous AF, the performance on the Nikon is slower. Logic says get Z6ii. WiFi and Bluetooth are available to connect the cameras to your mobile device. One drawback is the EVF which I find O.K. Fortunately there are third-party solutions (see our A7 series accessory list). So how do they compare? With manual kelvin settings, the Nikon looks a bit redder in comparison to the A7 III. Moreover, the A7 III is markedly lighter (8 percent) than the Z6 II. The Z6 and A7 III use a 35mm format CMOS sensor with a BSI (back-illuminated) structure, both of which have a low pass filter. In this review, we will be comparing Z6 and A7 III, two Pro Mirrorless cameras from Nikon and Sony. This article will cover the differences between the A7III vs A7RIII and how their features compare. With less extreme post processing, which is what you’ll encounter most of the time in real world use, both cameras deliver the same performance. We were not asked to write anything about these products, nor were we provided any other compensation of any kind. But I’ll also admit that I’ve grown quite fond of the Nikon. Sony set a new benchmark when it recently released the Sony a7RIV, the highest resolution full-frame sensor camera on the market.Offering 61-megapixels, the new Sony even beats full-frame DSLRs and builds on the success of its predecessor, the Sony a7RIII. If you want live view, you need to decrease the speed to 8fps on the Sony and 5.5fps on the Z6 (High mode). I'll be using it mostly for wildlife photography, but definitely need a hybrid as I plan to use video as well. Both the Nikon Z6 and Sony a7 III are full-frame mirrorless cameras, and it shows. Many have complained about the mono-slot for the memory card on the Z6, as well as the choice to go with the more expensive XQD/CFexpress format. Nikon Z6 was introduced to market in August 2018 and Sony A7 III was launched in February 2018. The Sony offers more personalisation and you need it to overcome the not very intuitive interface. You can however use the LCD as an AF Pad if you don’t like the physical joystick. Others may feel that eye-AF and dual card slots trump the advantages of the Nikon. Both cameras have Full frame sensors but Sony A7 III has a 24.0 MP and Nikon Z6 has a 25.0 MP resolution. Speed9. The buttons on the Z6 are slightly larger and softer to press, which gives you more pleasant tactile feedback when using them on a regular basis. In one corner, we have one of the most popular mirrorless cameras on the market – the Sony a7III, which was launched back in February 2018. They are both 24mp cameras and they are both priced at $2000. The two cameras can shoot as fast as 1/8000s, or as slow as 30s before the Bulb mode. The Z6 and A7 III share a certain number of specs when it comes to the electronic viewfinder. The first advantage of XQD is that the card is thicker and therefore more robust. At long last, Nikon today announced its first two full-frame mirrorless cameras, the Z6 and the Z7. Nikon hasn’t released a version for the Z6 and Z7 yet. Sony a7 III vs. a7r III: The Complete Comparison. Flash and extra features12. Another difference that can be a deal breaker for some is the presence of a single card slot on the Z6. The A7 III now has an impressive collection of native lenses. The Z6 proved a formidable performer when put through its paces for sports and wildlife, and Nikon’s first attempt at eye detection is very good. In low light, they both perform well although the A7 III is generally more reactive. I’m not sure how it happened to be honest; I can only think that I didn’t store it properly inside my bag and that it must have rubbed up against something sharp. Both cameras are weather sealed and feature a magnesium alloy chassis. The Nikon Z 7 is also bigger than the Sony, but just like the EOS R it is still smaller than the average DSLR. Here we are comparing two Mirrorless cameras from Nikon and Sony. So I am planning on either purchasing the Nikon Z6 or Sony a7iii. Find out where the EOS R wins! Nikon Z6 and Sony A7 III sensors have been tested by DxO and the results show that A7 III has a better overall score of 96, 1 points higher compared to Z6's score of 95. At first glance, these two cameras are very evenly matched. In the highlights, it is the A7 III that shows more strength and preserves more details outside the window. Both cameras have a dynamic area option where additional points remain active around the main one. Screen This tab shows the measurement values and graph derived directly from a RAW image when displayed on a computer screen at 100% magnification (i.e., one image pixel corresponding to one screen pixel). On the bright side, I view A7C as a camera with Sony RX1R ii full frame compact philosophy, A6600 ergonomics, A9 autofocus, A7III image quality. Best XQD memory card for the Nikon D5 (Sony and Lexar XQD cards tested/compared) Sony introduces new SD and XQD cards designed for the Nikon D5 and D500 cameras ; Dpreview: it can cost you over $10,000 to switch to Sony ; Nikon D5 vs. D850 vs. D750 vs. D500 vs. Z7 vs. Z6 vs. Sony a7rIII vs. a7III specifications comparison The A7 III is less expensive. I'm guessing Nikon is probably not going to update the Z6 with any more firmware updates. The video quality is superior when it comes to sharpness and high ISOs, and you can use Log profiles with internal recording. If we select the Landscape mode, the A7 III has a warmer look. Autofocus8. Let’s take a look. Tethering is available on both cameras. Also keep in mind that body weight is not the only deciding factor when comparing two interchangeable camera bodies, you have to also take into account the lenses that you will be using with these bodies. On balance, the Sony A7 III and Nikon Z6 are relatively well-matched in their specifications. I prefer the organisation of the Nikon menu as well. There are clever ideas on the Nikon body such as the still/video mode switch which I found quicker to use than the main dial. I'm in the market for my first real camera, and trying to make the decision between buying the new Nikon Z6II or the Sony A7III. Sonys have always had an obtuse menu interface that requires us to look everywhere to find anything. Nikon Z6(II) vs Sony A7III IBIS. If you buy something after clicking one of these links, we will receive a small commission. Additionally, select lenses offer extra customisation. Sony first launched this technology on the A7 mark II at the end of 2014, making it the first full frame camera with 5-axis stabilisation. Simple things like for example going from manual to auto ISO are very easy to do (hold down the button and use either the front or rear dial). Once again, the default values with the same colour profile show a completely different rendering for the two RAW files. While neither body is as big or as heavy as comparable full-frame DSLRs, you still get two relatively hefty cameras. The Nikon Z6 is technically heavier, at 675 g (1.5 lbs), but the Sony a7 III is hot on its heels (650 g/1.4 lbs), and the difference is small enough that you probably won’t notice when in the field. With a full buffer using two cards, the Sony A7rIII shoots at around 2 fps with a full buffer and takes more than 30 seconds to write a full buffer to both cards. I even managed two sharp shots at 1.6s with the Nikon. Now lets look at the top view comparison of Nikon Z6 and Sony A7 III. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison. One solution is to buy an optional grip extender. The Nikon video looks pretty solid in terms of sharpness and clarity in the video, but the video quality just looks over dealt with and very harsh. The Z6 has an official battery life of 310 frames (380 when using the monitor only), which is average by today standards. Nikon Z6(II) vs Sony A7III IBIS I'm in the market for my first real camera, and trying to make the decision between buying the new Nikon Z6II or the Sony A7III.